Sections 227.11 (2), 304.06 (1) (c), and 304.06 (1) (em), Stats.
Estimate of the Amount of Time State Employees will Spend Developing the Proposed Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The commission estimates that it will take approximately 50 hours to develop this rule, including drafting the rule and complying with rulemaking requirements.
Description of All of the Entities that will be Affected by the Rule
The rule affects persons who are convicted of criminal offenses and receive a sentence under s. 973.01, Stats., Department of Corrections staff, and Parole Commission staff.
Summary of and Preliminary Comparison with Any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Proposed Rule
There are no federal regulations which address the issue of modification of sentences under s. 973.01, Wis. Stats.
Contact Person
Kathryn R. Anderson, Chief Legal Counsel, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 3099 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 7925, Madison, WI 53707-7925, (608) 240-5049, kathryn.anderson@wisconsin.gov.
Public Defender Board
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on August 9, 2011.
Subject
Revises section PD 3.03, relating to determination of financial eligibility.
Objective of the Rule
Proposed changes to section PD 3.03 are made in response to the directives of 2011 Act 32.
Changes to Existing Law and Statutory Authority for changes
Wis. Stats. s. 977.02 authorizes the State Public Defender Board to promulgate rules regarding indigency and eligibility for legal services. In determining indigency, s. 977.02 (3) directs the State Public Defender to consider a person's available assets and income. Section 977.02 (3) (c) directs the SPD to consider as income only that income which exceeds the income limitations in s. 49.145 (3) (b). The executive budget act of the 2011 legislature, Act 32, sections 3559d and 3559h, made the following changes to the way by which the SPD considers the assets and income of persons applying for public defender representation.
Assets:
Prior legislation, 2009 Act 164, directed the State Public Defender, in determining whether someone was eligible for public defender representation, to consider assets in the manner described in s. 49.145 (3) (a) (Wisconsin Works). 2011 Act 32 changed these Act 164 provisions relating to W2, and directs the SPD to make the eligibility determination based on a combined equity value of available assets, without regard to asset valuation under Wis. Stats. s. 49.145 (3) (a).
Income:
Prior legislation, 2009 Act 164, tied eligibility to the federal poverty guidelines. Under prior legislation, eligibility for public defender representation would automatically change if the federal poverty guidelines were adjusted.
Pursuant to 2011 Act 32, eligibility will not automatically change when the federal poverty guideline is updated. Instead, income eligibility is frozen at 115% of the 2011 federal poverty guideline. Thus, in the event the federal poverty guideline changes, eligibility for state public defender representation will still be determined by the 2011 rate.
Time and Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
Changes mandated by 2011 Act 32 are ministerial in nature and will not require extensive expenditures of time or resources.
Entities that May be Affected by the Rule
Over time, as the poverty line adjusts, counties will spend additional resources on persons who do not qualify for State public defender representation.
There are No Federal Regulations Governing this Area.
Public Defender Board
This statement of scope was approved by the governor on August 16, 2011.
Relating to
Payment of legal fees; ability to pay; indigency.
Description of the Objective of the Rule
Revises section PD 6.025 are made in response to the directives of 2011 Act 32.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule and of New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives; the History, Background and Justification for the Proposed Rule
Wis. Stats. s. 977.02 authorizes the State Public Defender Board to promulgate rules regarding eligibility for legal services.
Prior legislation, 2009 Act 164, tied eligibility and ability to pay for SPD representation to the federal poverty guidelines. Pursuant to 2011 Act 32, sections 3559(d) and 3559(h) the guidelines used for determining whether someone is eligible for, and has ability to pay for, SPD representation will not automatically change when the federal poverty guideline is updated. Instead, the guidelines for income eligibility for representation and income available to repay the SPD for that representation, are frozen at 115% of the 2011 federal poverty guideline.
Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Pursuant to Wis. Stats. s. 977.02 (3) (b), 977.02 (3) (c), and 977.02 (4m), the SPD is directed to promulgate rules related to the ability of persons eligible for SPD representation to re-pay the cost of that representation.
Estimate of the Amount of Time that State Employees Will Spend to Develop the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
Changes mandated by 2011 Act 32 are ministerial in nature and will not require extensive expenditures of time or resources.
Description of All Entities that May be Impacted by The Rule
Over time, as the poverty line adjusts, counties will spend additional resources on appointing attorneys to represent persons who do not qualify for State public defender representation but cannot afford to retain private counsel.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison of Any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Rule
N/A.
Contact Person
Kathleen Pakes, Legal Counsel, State Public Defender, (608) 261-0633.
Revenue
This scope statement was approved by the governor on August 16, 2011.
Rule No.
Revises Chapter Tax 7.
Relating to
Requirements for fermented malt beverage wholesalers' permits and authorized activities for persons holding wholesalers' and brewers' permits.
Description of the Objective of the Rule
The objective of the proposed rule changes is to administer the provisions of ss. 125.28 (5) (e) and 125.29 (3), Stats., as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, and reflect revisions made by the Act to the authorized activities of persons holding wholesalers' and brewers' permits.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule and of New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives; the History, Background and Justification for the Proposed Rule
Existing policies are as set forth in the rules. No new policies are being proposed, other than to reflect law changes. If the rules are not changed, they will be incorrect in that they will not reflect current law or current Department policy.
Section 125.28 (5) (e), Stats., as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, requires the Department to promulgate rules to administer and enforce the requirements for fermented malt beverage wholesaler's permits under the Act. In addition, Act 32 converted the wholesaler's license issued by a local municipality to a statewide permit issued by the Department of Revenue and revised the authorized activities for wholesalers and brewers. These law changes must be reflected appropriately in Chapter Tax 7.
Statutory Authority for the Rule (Including the Statutory Citation and Language)
Section 125.03, Stats., provides “[t]he department, in furtherance of effective control, may promulgate rules consistent with this chapter and ch. 139."
Section 125.28 (5) (e), Stats., as created by 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, provides “[t]he department shall promulgate rules to administer and enforce the requirements under this subsection. The rules shall ensure coordination between the department's issuance and renewal of permits under this section and its enforcement of the requirements of this subsection, and shall require that all applications for issuance or renewal of permits under this section be processed by department personnel generally familiar with activities of fermented malt beverages wholesalers. The department shall establish by rule minimum requirements for warehouse facilities on premises described in permits issued under this section and for periodic site inspections by the department of such warehouse facilities."
Section 227.24 (1) (a), Stats., provides “[a]n agency may promulgate a rule as an emergency rule without complying with the notice, hearing and publication requirements under this chapter if preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare necessitates putting the rule into effect prior to the time it would take effect if the agency complied with the procedures."
Estimate of the Amount of Time that State Employees will Spend to Develop the Rule and of Other Resources Necessary to Develop the Rule
The department estimates it will take approximately 175 hours to develop the emergency and proposed permanent rule orders.
Description of All Entities that May be Impacted by the Rule
Municipal fermented malt beverage wholesaler licensees and retailer licensees, holders of brewer, brewpub and out-of-state shippers' permits, and all cities, villages, and towns issuing fermented malt beverage licenses.
Summary and Preliminary Comparison of Any Existing or Proposed Federal Regulation that Is Intended to Address the Activities to be Regulated by the Rule
The Federal Alcohol Administration Act, Title 27 United States Code, contains provisions regarding the qualification and operation of alternating proprietors at breweries and contract brewing arrangements as regulated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB). The department's emergency and proposed rule orders will be influenced by these regulations, but will not interfere with or duplicate them.
Contact Person
Dale Kleven (608) 266-8253.
Transportation
This statement of scope was approved by the governor Scope on August 18, 2011.
Subject
Revises Chapter Trans 327, relating to motor carrier safety.
Description of the Objective of the Rule
The federal regulations at 49 CFR 383 and 391 were revised by “Medical Certification Requirements as Part of the CDL", 73 FR 73096 (Dec. 1, 2008; RIN 2126-AA10). This rule implements new federal requirements for commercial drivers obtaining and submitting medical certificates conformity with those federal regulations. Section 343.065 (3) of the statutes, created 2011 Wisconsin Act 32, requires the department to downgrade commercial drivers licenses of drivers who fail to provide federally mandated medical certifications, and to promulgate rules defining this downgrade process.
This rule-making will allow the department to:
  define the procedures for drivers to certify their driving type (Tier) to the department;
  create the process for downgrading a license and reinstating a license after the downgrade has occurred; and
  describe the types of notifications drivers and employers will receive prior to the federal medical card expiration; when the driver is downgraded; and when the driver is reinstated.
Description of Existing Policies Relevant to the Rule and of New Policies Proposed to be Included in the Rule and an Analysis of Policy Alternatives; the History, Background and Justification for the Proposed Rule
Starting in January 2012, all original and renewal applicants for a commercial driver's license must certify their driving type (Tier). Drivers operating in interstate commerce who are not subject to the exceptions identified (Tier 1) also must furnish a copy of their federal medical certificate (sometimes called a “Fed Med card") to the department. The department must electronically capture the information on the federal medical certificate, and retain a copy of the federal medical certificate on file.
In January 2014, ALL persons in Wisconsin that hold a commercial driver's license (CDL) will be required to comply with these requirements as well. The department will downgrade drivers that fail to comply with these requirements in accordance with the procedures defined below.
These federal regulations, as well as s. 343.065 (3), stats., require the department to downgrade a driver's commercial driving privileges if the driver is operating in non-excepted interstate commerce (Tier 1) and fails to submit a federal medical certificate or to keep his or her federal medical certificate current.
Several alternatives exist to implementing these new regulations for allowing drivers to certify their driving type as well as the downgrade process.
Alternatives for Commercial Drivers to Certify Driving Type:
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.