For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
Joint Legislative Council prefatory note: This bill was prepared for the Joint
Legislative Council's Study Committee on Student Achievement Guarantee in Education
(SAGE) Program.
SAGE is a categorical state aid program that provides funding to schools with
low-income students in primary grades (K-3) if certain statutory requirements are met.
The statutory requirements include: (a) reducing class sizes to no larger than 18 students

to one classroom teacher, or 30 students to two classroom teachers; (b) ensuring that
certain education and human services are available in the school; (c) ensuring that a
rigorous curriculum is provided; and (d) providing staff development and requiring
professional staff accountability.
Before an eligible school may participate in SAGE, the school board of the district
must enter into a contract with the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) on behalf of
the school. SAGE contracts are for five years and may be renewed for additional five-year
terms.
This bill creates a program entitled "Achievement Gap Reduction" (AGR) under a
new section of the statutes. The new program is similar to the SAGE program and
incorporates many existing aspects of the SAGE program; however, it prevents DPI from
entering into any new SAGE contracts or renewing any existing SAGE contracts.
The new AGR program is similar to SAGE in the following key aspects:
The AGR program targets funding to schools with low-income students.
Participating schools are subject to a five-year contract between the school district and
DPI. The contract requires the school to meet certain conditions.
The AGR program makes a school district eligible to sign an AGR contract on
behalf of a school that is subject to a SAGE contract on the effective date of the bill. It
does not authorize any AGR contracts for schools not currently in SAGE.
The AGR program allows a participating school to meet the obligations of its
contract by limiting classroom ratios to 18:1 or 30:2, provided the school district also
provides professional development for teachers on small group instruction.
The AGR program is also subject to a required annual evaluation.
No AGR contract may contain a waiver of AGR requirements. School districts are
currently prohibited from requesting waivers of SAGE requirements.
The new AGR program differs from the existing SAGE program in the following
key aspects:
The AGR program allows a school to meet its obligations under the contract by
using one of three strategies, or a combination of these strategies: (a) one-to-one tutoring
provided by a licensed teacher; (b) instructional coaching for teachers provided by a
licensed teacher; or (c) maintaining 18:1 or 30:2 classroom ratios and providing
professional development on small group instruction. Unlike SAGE, the AGR program
does not require all participating grades to meet the 18:1 or 30:2 classroom ratios in order
to receive funding.
The AGR program requires a participating school to create performance goals,
including reduction of the achievement gap between low-income students in that school
and students in the same grade and subject statewide.
The AGR program requires school board review of implementation and progress
toward achieving performance objectives in each participating school every semester.
The AGR program is funded by a sum sufficient appropriation at the per-pupil
level currently received by SAGE participants ($2,027).
AB196,1 1Section 1. 20.255 (2) (cu) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB196,2,42 20.255 (2) (cu) Achievement guarantee gap reduction contracts. The amounts
3in the schedule for
A sum sufficient for aid to school districts and the program
4evaluation under s. ss. 118.43 and 118.44.

Note: Amends the name of the existing SAGE appropriation and appropriates a
sum sufficient to fund the new achievement gap reduction contracts authorized by the
bill.
AB196,2 1Section 2. 118.38 (1) (a) 9. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB196,3,42 118.38 (1) (a) 9. The requirements established for achievement guarantee
3contracts under s. 118.43 and for achievement gap reduction contracts under s.
4118.44
.
AB196,3 5Section 3. 118.43 (9) of the statutes is created to read:
AB196,3,76 118.43 (9) Sunset. No contract may be entered into or renewed under this
7section after the effective date of this subsection .... [LRB inserts date].
Note: Prohibits the creation or renewal of SAGE contracts after the effective date
of the bill. Contracts will be available to schools currently participating in SAGE under
a new section of the statutes entitled "Achievement Gap Reduction," which is created in
the following Section.
AB196,4 8Section 4. 118.44 of the statutes is created to read:
AB196,3,10 9118.44 Achievement gap reduction; state aid. (1) Definitions. In this
10section:
AB196,3,1411 (a) "Achievement gap" means the difference between the academic
12performance of low-income pupils in a particular school in a particular grade in a
13particular subject area and the academic performance of all pupils enrolled in public
14schools statewide in that same grade level and in that same subject area.
AB196,3,1615 (b) "Class size" means the number of pupils assigned to a regular classroom
16teacher on the 3rd Friday of September.
AB196,3,1817 (c) "Low income" means the measure of low income that is used by the school
18district under 20 USC 2723.
AB196,3,2019 (d) "Participating grade" means grade 5-year-old kindergarten and grades 1
20to 3 in a school subject to a contract under this section.
AB196,4,2
1(e) "Participating school" means a school that has entered into a contract under
2this section.
Note: Maintains definitions of "class size" and "low income" from the SAGE statute
and creates new definitions for "achievement gap," "participating grade," and
"participating school."
AB196,4,5 3(2) Eligibility. (a) School districts. The school board of any school district that
4has a contract under s. 118.43 on the effective date of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts
5date], is eligible to enter into a contract with the department under sub. (3).
AB196,4,86 (b) Individual schools. A school is eligible to participate in the program under
7this section if the school is subject to a contract under s. 118.43 on the effective date
8of this paragraph .... [LRB inserts date].
Note: The bill creates a new "Achievement Gap Reduction" program section of the
statutes to replace the SAGE program. This subsection provides that school districts and
schools that are currently participating in SAGE will be eligible to participate in the AGR
program.
AB196,4,13 9(3) Contract. The school board of an eligible school district may enter into a
105-year contract with the department on behalf of one or more schools in the school
11district that are eligible under sub. (2) (b). No achievement gap reduction contract
12entered into under this section may include a waiver of any requirement of or rule
13promulgated under the authority of this section.
AB196,4,17 14(4) Requirements. (a) Strategies: class size; instructional coaching; tutoring.
15The department shall require a school board that has entered into a contract under
16sub. (3) to implement one or more of the following strategies in each participating
17school:
AB196,4,2018 1. Provide professional development related to small group instruction and
19reduce the class size in one or more classes in one or more participating grades to one
20of the following:
AB196,4,2121 a. No more than 18.
AB196,5,2
1b. No more than 30 in a combined classroom having at least 2 regular classroom
2teachers.
AB196,5,73 2. Provide data-driven instructional coaching for one or more teachers of one
4or more participating grades. The instruction shall be provided by licensed teachers
5who possess appropriate content knowledge to assist classroom teachers in
6improving instruction in math or reading and possess expertise in reducing the
7achievement gap.
AB196,5,128 3. Provide data-informed, one-to-one tutoring to pupils in one or more classes
9in one or more participating grades who are struggling with reading or mathematics
10or both subjects. Tutoring shall be provided during regular school hours by a licensed
11teacher using an instructional program found to be effective by the What Works
12Clearinghouse of the Institute of Education Sciences.
AB196,5,1513 (b) Annual reporting. The department shall require a school board that has
14entered into a contract under sub. (3) to annually report all of the following to the
15department:
AB196,5,1816 1. Before November 1 of each school year, a brief description of the strategies
17identified under par. (a) that the school board intends to implement in each
18participating grade in each participating school.
AB196,5,2119 2.   Before the last day of each school year, a brief description of the strategies
20identified under par. (a) that the school board did implement in each participating
21grade in each participating school.
AB196,6,322 (c) Goals. Each contract entered into under sub. (3) shall include a description
23of the performance objectives for the academic achievement of the pupils enrolled in
24participating grades in each participating school and the formative and summative
25assessments that will be used to evaluate success in attaining those objectives. The

1school board and participating schools shall identify specific, measurable, and
2achievable performance objectives, including reducing the achievement gap in math
3and reading in each participating grade.
AB196,6,84 (d) School board review. The school district shall require each participating
5school to present information regarding the school's implementation of the contract
6requirements under par. (a), its performance objectives under par. (c), and its success
7in attaining the objectives to the school board at the end of every semester of the
8contract.
Note: Contracts signed under the AGR program must require a participating
school to implement one of three strategies, or a combination of the three. The three
strategies include: (a) small class sizes of 18:1 or 30:2 and professional development
related to small group instruction; (b) data-driven instructional coaching for teachers;
or (c) data-informed one-to-one tutoring for students at risk of difficulty with math or
reading.
An AGR contract must also require annual reporting to DPI. A school district must
report at the beginning of the school year what strategies it intends to use, and must
report by the end of the year what strategies it did use.
Further, an AGR contract must require a school to set performance objectives that
include reducing the achievement gap for low-income pupils in math and reading and to
specify the assessments the school will use to determine if it achieved the objectives.
Finally, an AGR contract must require a school to describe its implementation of
the program and report its objectives and its success in achieving them to the school board
every semester.
AB196,6,12 9(5) Contract renewals. (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a contract under this
10section may be renewed for one or more terms of 5 school years. No achievement gap
11reduction contract renewed under this section may include a waiver of any
12requirement of or rule promulgated under the authority of this section.
AB196,6,1513 (b) The department may not renew a contract with a school district on behalf
14of a participating school if the department determines that the school board has
15failed to comply with the terms of the contract under sub. (4).
Note: Prohibits DPI from renewing an AGR contract with a school district on
behalf of any school that fails to comply with the contractual requirements.
AB196,7,2
1(6) State aid. (a) In this subsection, "amount appropriated" means the amount
2under s. 20.255 (2) (cu) in any fiscal year less $250,000.
AB196,7,63 (b) From the appropriation under s. 20.255 (2) (cu), the department shall pay
4to each school district that has entered into a contract with the department under
5this section $2,027.25 multiplied by the number of low-income pupils enrolled in a
6participating grade.
AB196,7,87 (c) The school board shall use the aid under this section to satisfy the terms of
8the contract.
AB196,7,119 (d) The department shall cease payments under this section to any school
10district if the school board withdraws from the contract before expiration of the
11contract.
AB196,7,1312 (e) The department shall promulgate rules to implement and administer the
13payment of state aid under this subsection.
AB196,7,1814 (f) Limitations on payment. If a school fails to implement the requirements
15under sub. (4) (a) in a participating grade for which the department has made
16payment, the school board of the district shall, upon the request of the department,
17reimburse the department the amount paid for the participating grade on the
18school's behalf for the school year in which the requirements were not implemented.
Note: Largely maintains language related to state funding and evaluation from
the SAGE statute. The Section applies the existing appropriation and funding for the
SAGE program to the newly created AGR program, but changes the appropriation from
a sum certain to a sum sufficient to provide the per-pupil amount awarded to schools
participating in SAGE in the 2013-14 school year. While current law establishes a
maximum per-pupil payment of $2,250 for each low-income SAGE pupil, the current
appropriation of $108.9 million was not sufficient to provide the full per-pupil payment
and therefore payments were prorated for 2013-14 at 90.1 percent, resulting in a
per-pupil payment of $2,027.25.
Unlike the SAGE program, the AGR program requires the school district to return
the funds paid for a participating grade for any school year in which the school does not
implement the strategies required under the AGR contract under sub. (4) in that grade.

As in the SAGE statute, the Section maintains the $250,000 allocation for
evaluation of the program and requires DPI to promulgate rules regarding payment of
state aid.
AB196,8,3 1(7) Evaluation. (a) Beginning in the 2017-18 school year, the department shall
2arrange for an annual evaluation of the program under this section and shall allocate
3from the appropriation under s. 20.255 (2) (cu) $250,000 for that purpose.
AB196,8,64 (b) The entity performing the evaluation under this subsection shall distribute
5each such evaluation to each school district that has entered into a contract under
6sub. (3).
Note: Requires DPI to arrange for yearly evaluation of the AGR program following
the first year of implementation. As in the SAGE statute, the subsection also budgets
$250,000 for this evaluation. Unlike the SAGE statute, the subsection requires the
evaluation to be sent to each participating school district.
AB196,8,77 (End)
Loading...
Loading...