AB547,6,2
11. An "A" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
2received are balanced.
AB547,6,43 2. A "B" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
4received are within 5 percent of being balanced.
AB547,6,65 3. A "C" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
6received are within 10 percent of being balanced.
AB547,6,87 4. A "D" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
8received are within 15 percent of being balanced.
AB547,6,109 5. An "F" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
10received are more than 15 percent out of balance.
AB547,6 11Section 6. 60.85 (8) (g) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,6,1712 60.85 (8) (g) For the first 8 years of a tax incremental district's life, the town's
13chief financial officer shall award a tax incremental district a "B" if the district's
14projected expenditures and tax increments received are in balance with the
15projections for those 2 items, as contained in the district's project plan. The report
16card shall explain how this grade is awarded. A tax incremental district that does
17not meet this standard must be awarded a grade that is less than a "B."
AB547,7 18Section 7. 66.0602 (3) (dm) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB547,7,319 66.0602 (3) (dm) If the department of revenue does not certify a value
20increment for a tax incremental district for the current year as a result of the
21district's termination, the levy increase limit otherwise applicable under this section
22in the current year to the political subdivision in which the district is located is
23increased by an amount equal to the political subdivision's maximum allowable levy
24for the immediately preceding year, multiplied by a percentage equal to 50 80 percent
25of the amount determined by dividing the value increment of the terminated tax

1incremental district, calculated for the previous year, by the political subdivision's
2equalized value for the previous year, all as determined by the department of
3revenue.
AB547,8 4Section 8. 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. o. of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,7,65 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. o. Expenses incurred by the city to recruit a new business to
6locate in the tax incremental district.
AB547,9 7Section 9. 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. p. of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,7,108 66.1105 (2) (f) 1. p. Expenses incurred by the city to remodel the interior space
9of an existing building that is located in the tax incremental district to make the
10space useable for a business.
AB547,10 11Section 10. 66.1105 (2) (f) 2. b. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB547,7,1412 66.1105 (2) (f) 2. b. The Except for a parking structure that supports
13redevelopment activities, the
cost of constructing or expanding any facility, if the city
14generally finances similar facilities only with utility user fees.
AB547,11 15Section 11. 66.1105 (6) (am) 6. of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,7,1716 66.1105 (6) (am) 6. No expenditure may be made later than 5 years before the
17termination date of a tax incremental district to which sub. (7) (av) applies.
AB547,12 18Section 12. 66.1105 (6m) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB547,8,219 66.1105 (6m) (c) The city shall prepare and make available to the public
20updated annual reports describing the financial status of each existing tax
21incremental district, including an itemized list of expenditures paid and revenues
22received in prior years, and anticipated expenditures to be paid, and revenues to be
23received, in future years
. The city shall send a copy of the report to each overlying
24district by May July 1 annually and shall present the report to the common council

1at an open meeting. The city shall also hold a hearing on the report in conjunction
2with the presentation of the report
.
AB547,13 3Section 13. 66.1105 (6m) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,8,94 66.1105 (6m) (d) In the annual report described under par. (c), the city shall
5also include an assessment of each existing tax incremental district's performance.
6The assessment shall compare a district's total actual expenditures to the total
7amount of tax increments received and determine whether these amounts are the
8same or if they are out of balance. This assessment shall be completed by the city's
9chief financial officer.
AB547,14 10Section 14. 66.1105 (6m) (e) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,8,1511 66.1105 (6m) (e) Annually, beginning in 2014, the city's chief financial officer
12shall prepare a report card for each tax incremental district for which the city
13prepares a report described under par. (c). The report card shall evaluate each tax
14incremental district based on the degree to which the district's total actual
15expenditures and total tax increments received are balanced or out of balance.
AB547,15 16Section 15. 66.1105 (6m) (f) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,8,2317 66.1105 (6m) (f) The city shall issue a report card as described in par. (e), which
18it shall forward to the common council. The report card shall contain the chief
19financial officer's explanation of the methods and data he or she used to evaluate a
20tax incremental district. The common council shall make the report card and the
21explanation available to members of the public. Subject to par. (g), the city's chief
22financial officer shall award a tax incremental district one of the following grades on
23its report card:
AB547,8,2524 1. An "A" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
25received are balanced.
AB547,9,2
12. A "B" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
2received are within 5 percent of being balanced.
AB547,9,43 3. A "C" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
4received are within 10 percent of being balanced.
AB547,9,65 4. A "D" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
6received are within 15 percent of being balanced.
AB547,9,87 5. An "F" if the district's total actual expenditures and total tax increments
8received are more than 15 percent out of balance.
AB547,16 9Section 16. 66.1105 (6m) (g) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,9,1510 66.1105 (6m) (g) For the first 8 years of a tax incremental district's life, the
11city's chief financial officer shall award a tax incremental district a "B" if the district's
12projected expenditures and tax increments received are in balance with the
13projections for those 2 items, as contained in the district's project plan. The report
14card shall explain how this grade is awarded. A tax incremental district that does
15not meet this standard must be awarded a grade that is less than a "B."
AB547,17 16Section 17. 66.1105 (7) (av) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,9,2117 66.1105 (7) (av) Notwithstanding the limits specified in pars. (ak) and (am),
18with regard to a district that earns at least a "B" grade on its report card under sub.
19(6m) (f) for the year in which the district would otherwise be required to terminate
20under par. (ak) or (am), 10 years after that otherwise applicable termination date if
21at least one of the following applies:
AB547,9,2322 1. The planning commission adopts an amendment to the district's project plan
23under sub. (4) (h) 1.
AB547,9,2524 2. If the district's project plan has been amended the maximum number of times
25that are authorized under sub. (4) (h) 2., the planning commission adopts a resolution

1requesting that the joint review board authorize an extension of the termination date
2as described in this paragraph and the joint review board authorizes the extension,
3except that the procedure described in this subdivision may not be used more than
4once for that district. If the joint review board authorizes an extension under this
5subdivision, the planning commission may amend the district's project plan under
6sub. (4) (h) 1. as if the district's project plan had not been amended the maximum
7number of times allowed under sub. (4) (h) 2.
AB547,18 8Section 18. 66.1105 (17) (d) of the statutes is created to read:
AB547,10,129 66.1105 (17) (d) Exception based on report card grades. 1. Subject to subds.
102. to 4., if the average grade of all tax incremental districts in a city, under sub. (6m)
11(f), is a "B" in any year, the 12 percent limit under sub. (4) (gm) 4. c. shall be 15
12percent.
AB547,10,1713 2. If the average grade of all tax incremental districts in a city, under sub. (6m)
14(f), is less than a "B" in any year subsequent to a year in which the the 12 percent limit
15becomes 15 percent under subd. 1., the limit shall revert back to 12 percent if the
16equalized value of taxable property of all existing districts within the city is 12
17percent or less of the total equalized value of taxable property within the city.
AB547,10,2118 3. If the average grade of all tax incremental districts in a city, under sub. (6m)
19(f), is less than a "B" in any year subsequent to a year in which the the 12 percent limit
20becomes 15 percent under subd. 1., the limit shall remain at 15 percent if all of the
21following apply:
AB547,10,2522 a. A new district was created in the city, or the project plan of an existing district
23is amended and adds territory to the district, between the time that the limit was
24raised to 15 percent under subd. 1. and the year in which the average grade of all tax
25incremental districts in a city, under sub. (6m) (f), is less than a "B."
AB547,11,3
1b. The equalized value of taxable property of all existing districts within the
2city is more than 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property within
3the city.
AB547,11,74 4. If a city's limit under sub. (4) (gm) 4. c. becomes 15 percent under subd. 1.
5and the city creates a new district that increases the equalized value of taxable
6property of all existing districts within the city above the 12 percent limit under sub.
7(4) (gm) 4. c., the limit shall revert to 12 percent if all of the following occur:
AB547,11,128 a. Due to the termination of existing districts or the subtraction of territory
9from an existing district under an amendment to a project plan, the department of
10revenue determines the equalized value of taxable property of all existing districts
11within the city is 12 percent or less than the equalized value of taxable property
12within the city.
AB547,11,1513 b. The average grade of all tax incremental districts in a city, under sub. (6m)
14(f), is less than a "B" in the year in which the determination described in subd. par.
154. a. occurs.
AB547,19 16Section 19. Initial applicability.
AB547,11,1817 (1) The treatment of section 66.0602 (3) (dm) of the statutes first applies to a
18levy that is imposed in December 2013.
AB547,11,1919 (End)
Loading...
Loading...