Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Notice is hereby further given that pursuant to s. 227.114, Stats., the proposed rule may have an effect on small businesses. The initial regulatory flexibility analysis is as follows:
a.   Types of small businesses affected:
Domestic life and health insurers that complete a life annual statement and domestic fraternal insurers.
b.   Description of reporting and bookkeeping procedures required:
None beyond those currently required.
c.   Description of professional skills required:
None beyond those currently required.
OCI Small Business Regulatory Coordinator
The OCI small business coordinator is Louie Corneillus and may be reached at phone number (608) 264-8113 or at email address louie.corneillus@wisconsin.gov.
Contact Person
A copy of the full text of the proposed rule changes, analysis, and fiscal estimate may be obtained from the OCI internet Web site at http://oci.wi.gov/ocirules.htm or by contacting Inger Williams, Public Information and Communications, OCI, at: inger.williams@wisconsin.gov, (608) 264-8110, 125 South Webster Street — 2nd Floor, Madison, WI or PO Box 7873, Madison, WI 53707-7873.
PROPOSED ORDER AMENDING A RULE
Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
Rule No. 145-: To amend s. Ins 51.01 (4) (a) 2., Wis. Admin. Code.
Relating to: risk based capital requirements and affecting small business.
The statement of scope of this rule, SS 069-12, was approved by the Governor on September 13, 2012, published in Register No. 681, on September 30, 2012, and approved by the Commissioner on October 15, 2012.
Analysis Prepared by the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI)
1. Statutes interpreted
ss. 623.11 (1) and (2), Wis. Stats.
2. Statutory authority
ss. 227.11 (2) (a), 623.11 (1) and (2), Wis. Stats.
3. Explanation of OCI's authority to promulgate the proposed rule under these statutes
Pursuant to s. 623.11 (1), Wis. Stats., “The commissioner shall, when necessary, determine the amount of compulsory surplus that an insurer is required to have in order not to be financially hazardous under s. 645.41 (4), Wis. Stats., as an amount that will provide reasonable security against contingencies affecting the insurer's financial position that are not fully covered by reserves or reinsurance."
Pursuant to s. 623.11 (2), Wis. Stats., “The commissioner may . . . establish by rule minimum ratios for the compulsory surplus in relation to any relevant variables, including the following: (a) amounts at risk; (b) premiums written or premiums earned; (c) liabilities; (d) equity investments of all or certain kinds in combination with any of the variables under pars. (a) to (c)."
The company action level provision under the regulation provides an early warning that an insurer might be approaching a financially hazardous condition. The proposed change to the regulation would modify a single variable, as authorized by s. 623.11 (2), Wis. Stats., potentially resulting in an earlier warning that a company is approaching financially hazardous condition.
4. Related statutes or rules
Section 623.11, Wis. Stats. and s. Ins 51.01, Wis. Admin. Code, both address risk based capital requirements. The proposed rule merely updates the minimum ratio for insurers.
5. The plain language analysis and summary of the proposed rule
The existing regulation establishes risk based capital requirements for an insurer based on the risks inherent in the insurer's operations by requiring it to perform a calculation of its authorized control level risk based capital. Under the current regulation, a company action level event, which requires the company to take certain remedial steps, is triggered if:
(a) An insurer's capital is between 1.5 and 2.0 times the authorized control level risk based capital, or
(b) The insurer's capital is at or below 2.5 times the authorized control level risk based capital and the insurer has a negative trend test result, calculated pursuant to the risk based capital instructions.
The proposed rule would change the “2.5" to “3.0"; i.e., a company action level event would occur if the insurer's capital is at or below 3.0 times the authorized control level risk based capital and the insurer has a negative trend test result.
The proposed rule will update this regulation to be consistent with the NAIC model regulation and will also bring Wisconsin's requirements for life insurers into alignment with the requirements for health insurers and property and casualty insurers.
The proposed rule will apply to domestic life and health insurers that complete a life annual statement, and domestic fraternal insurers. The impact is expected to be minimal.
6. Summary of and preliminary comparison with any existing or proposed federal regulation that is intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule
The Office is unaware of any existing or proposed federal regulations that are intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule change.
7. Comparison of similar rules in adjacent states as found by OCI
Illinois: 215 ILCS 5/35A-15 (a) (1) (B) (2013) contains provisions comparable to Wisconsin's existing rule.
Iowa: IAC s. 521E.3 1. a. (2) (2013) contains provisions comparable to Wisconsin's existing rule.
Michigan: MCLS s. 50.1204a (2013) adopts the NAIC Model Law by reference.
Minnesota: Minn. Stat. s. 60A.60 Subd. 11 (1) (2013) contains provisions less stringent that Wisconsin's existing rule.
8. A summary of the factual data and analytical methodologies that OCI used in support of the proposed rule and how any related findings support the regulatory approach chosen for the proposed rule
The Office is proposing this rule change to make the regulation consistent with the NAIC model regulation for the purposes of maintaining accreditation. The amendment will also bring Wisconsin's requirements for life insurers into alignment with the requirements for health insurers and property and casualty insurers. Little, if any, Wisconsin insurers will be affected by this rule change.
9. Any analysis and supporting documentation that OCI used in support of OCI's determination of the rule's effect on small businesses under s. 227.114
Based upon revenue and ownership structure, there may be an effect on small businesses but any effect would be minimal as very few, if any, insurers meet the definition of a small business and non-insurance small businesses are protected by this proposed rule change as the amendment provides an earlier warning that a life insurer might be approaching a financially hazardous condition.
10. See the attached Private Sector Fiscal Analysis.
11. A description of the Effect on Small Business
There may be an effect on small businesses but any effect would be minimal as very few, if any, insurers meet the definition of a small business and non-insurance small businesses are protected by this proposed rule change as the amendment provides a an earlier warning that a life insurer might be approaching a financially hazardous condition.
12. Agency contact person
A copy of the full text of the proposed rule changes, analysis and fiscal estimate may be obtained from the Web site at: http://oci.wi.gov/ocirules.htm
or by contacting Inger Williams, OCI Services Section, at:
Phone: (608) 264-8110
Address: 125 South Webster St — 2nd Floor, Madison WI 53703-3474
Mail: P.O. Box 7873, Madison, WI 53707-7873
13. Place where comments are to be submitted and deadline for submission
The deadline for submitting comments is 4:00 p.m. on the 14th day after the date for the hearing stated in the Notice of Hearing.
Mailing address:
Sarah E. Norberg
Legal Unit — OCI Rule Comment for Rule Ins 51.01
Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
PO Box 7873
Madison WI 53707-7873
Street address:
Sarah E. Norberg
Legal Unit — OCI Rule Comment for Rule Ins 51.01
Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
125 South Webster St — 2nd Floor
Madison WI 53703-3474
Email address:
Sarah E. Norberg
The proposed rule changes are:
SECTION 1. Ins 51.01 (4) (a) 2., is amended to read:
Ins 51.01 (4) (a) 2. If a life or health insurer that completes the life annual statement for the reporting year, the insurer has total adjusted capital which is greater than or equal to its company action level risk based capital but less than the product of its authorized control level risk based capital and 2.53.0 and has a negative trend.
SECTION 2. These changes first apply January 1, 2014.
SECTION 3. These changes will take effect on the first day of the month after publication, as provided in s. 227.22 (2) (intro.), Wis. Stats.
SECTION 4. This section may be enforced under ss. 601.41, 601.64, 623.11, Wis. Stats., or any other enforcement provision of chs. 600 to 646, Wis. Stats.
Private Sector Fiscal Analysis for section Ins 51.01 relating to risk based capital requirements and affecting small business
This rule change will have no significant effect on the private sector regulated by OCI.
STATE OF WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
DOA-2049 (C04/2011)
Division of Executive Budget and Finance
101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor
P.O. Box 7864
Madison, WI 53707-7864
FAX: (608) 267-0372
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES — FISCAL ESTIMATE
1.   Fiscal Estimate Version
  X Original Updated Corrected
2.   Administrative Rule Chapter Title and Number
  Ins 51.01 (4) (a) 2.
3.   Subject
  Risk based capital requirements and affecting small business.
4.   State Fiscal Effect:
X No Fiscal Effect
Indeterminate
Increase Existing Revenues
Decrease Existing Revenues
Increase Costs
Yes X No   May be possible to absorb
      within agency's budget.
Decrease Costs
5.   Fund Sources Affected:
GPR   FED   PRO   PRS   SEG   SEG-S
6.   Affected Ch. 20, Stats. Appropriations:
None
7.   Local Government Fiscal Effect:
X No Fiscal Effect
Indeterminate
Increase Revenues
Decrease Revenues
Increase Costs
Decrease Costs
8.   Local Government Units Affected:
Towns Villages Cities Counties School Districts WTCS Districts Others: None
9.   Private Sector Fiscal Effect (small businesses only):
X No Fiscal Effect
Indeterminate
Increase Revenues
Decrease Revenues
Yes No May have significant
    economic impact on a
    substantial number of
    small businesses
Increase Costs
Yes X No     May have significant
      economic impact on a
      substantial number of
      small businesses
Decrease Costs
10.   Types of Small Businesses Affected:
Domestic health or life insurers or domestic fraternal insurers that meet the definition of a small business.
11.   Fiscal Analysis Summary
12.   Long-Range Fiscal Implications
None
13.   Name - Prepared by
Sarah E. Norberg
Telephone Number
(608) 266-0082
Date
07/02/2013
14.   Name – Analyst Reviewer
Telephone Number
Date
Signature—Secretary or Designee
Telephone Number
Date
STATE OF WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
DOA-2049 (R03/2012)
Division of Executive Budget and Finance
101 East Wilson Street, 10th Floor
P.O. Box 7864
Madison, WI 53707-7864
FAX: (608) 267-0372
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
Fiscal Estimate & Economic Impact Analysis
1. Type of Estimate and Analysis
X Original   Updated   Corrected
2. Administrative Rule Chapter, Title and Number
Agency 145 Ch. Ins 51.01 (4) (a) 2.
3. Subject
Risk Based Capital Requirements and affecting small business amendment beginning January 1, 2014.
4. Fund Sources Affected
5. Chapter 20, Stats. Appropriations Affected
GPR   FED   X PRO   PRS   SEG   SEG-S
None
6. Fiscal Effect of Implementing the Rule
X No Fiscal Effect
Indeterminate
Increase Existing Revenues
Decrease Existing Revenues
Increase Costs
Could Absorb Within Agency's Budget
Decrease Cost
7. The Rule Will Impact the Following (Check All That Apply)
State's Economy
Local Government Units
X Specific Businesses/Sectors
Public Utility Rate Payers
X Small Businesses (if checked, complete Attachment A)
8. Would Implementation and Compliance Costs Be Greater Than $20 million?
Yes   X No
9. Policy Problem Addressed by the Rule
The proposed rule potentially results in an earlier warning that a company is approaching a financially hazardous condition. The proposed rule updates an existing regulation to be consistent with the NAIC model regulation and will also bring Wisconsin's requirements for life insurers into alignment with the requirements for health insurers and property and casualty insurers.
10. Summary of the businesses, business sectors, associations representing business, local governmental units, and individuals that may be affected by the proposed rule that were contacted for comments.
OCI solicited comments generally through publication requesting comments from the public utilizing the OCI website. Additionally OCI solicited comments from the following businesses, associations representing businesses, local governmental units and individuals:
Northwestern Mutual
Trilogy
Johnson Insurance
Thrivent
Network Health
United HealthCare
Group Health Cooperative of Eau Claire
Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin
HIRSP
Arrowhead Strategies
Capital Group of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Health Plans
Wisconsin Medical Society
WPS Insurance
Dean Health Plan
Unity Health Plan
TASC
Physicians Plus Insurance Corporation
Wisconsin Hospital Association
Gundersen Lutheran
Wisconsin Dental Association
Security Health Plan
NAIFA Wisconsin
Assurant Health
Wisconsin Counties Group Health Trust
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin
Ministry Health Care
Humana
Aurora Health Care
Mayo Health Care
WEA Trust
Health Partners
Mercy Health System
WellPoint
Arise Health Plan
11. Identify the local governmental units that participated in the development of this EIA.
None beyond solicitation for comments.
12. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Specific Businesses, Business Sectors, Public Utility Rate Payers, Local Governmental Units and the State's Economy as a Whole (Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
The proposed rule will affect domestic life and health insurers who complete a life annual statement, and domestic fraternal insurers. The impact is expected to be minimal. Non-insurance small businesses are protected by this proposed rule change as the amendment provides an earlier warning that a life insurer might be approaching a financially hazardous condition. There may be an effect on small businesses but any effect would be minimal as very few, if any, insurers meet the definition of a small business.
13. Benefits of Implementing the Rule and Alternative(s) to Implementing the Rule
The proposed rule potentially results in an earlier warning that a company is approaching a financially hazardous condition. The proposed rule updates an existing regulation to be consistent with the NAIC model regulation and will also bring Wisconsin's requirements for life insurers into alignment with the requirements for health insurers and property and casualty insurers. This change makes the application of standards uniform across lines of insurance minimizing disparate treatment of insurers.
14. Long Range Implications of Implementing the Rule
The long-range implications of the rule as proposed are: 1) earlier warning that a company is approaching a financially hazardous condition, 2) consistency in risk based capital requirements for life, health and property and casualty insurers, and 3) consistency with the NAIC model regulation for the purposes of maintaining accreditation for domestic insurers conducting business in other states.
15. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Federal Government
OCI is unaware of any existing or proposed federal regulations that are intended to address the activities to be regulated by the proposed rule change.
16. Compare With Approaches Being Used by Neighboring States (Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Minnesota)
Illinois and Iowa have laws comparable to Wisconsin's existing rule (215 ILCS 5/35A-15 (a) (1) (B) (2013) and IAC s. 521E.3 1. a. (2) (2013)). Michigan adopts the NAIC Model Law by reference (MCLS s. 50.1204a (2013)). Effective December 31, 2013, Minnesota will have a requirement comparable to Wisconsin's proposed rule (Minn. Stat. s. 60A.62 Subd. 1 (1) (ii) (2013)).
17. Contact Name
18. Contact Phone Number
Louie Cornelius
608-264-8113
This document can be made available in alternate formats to individuals with disabilities upon request.
ATTACHMENT A
1. Summary of Rule's Economic and Fiscal Impact on Small Businesses (Separately for each Small Business Sector, Include Implementation and Compliance Costs Expected to be Incurred)
Non-insurance small businesses are protected by this proposed rule change as the amendment provides an earlier warning that a life insurer might be approaching a financially hazardous condition. There may be an effect on small businesses but any effect would be minimal as very few, if any, insurers meet the definition of a small business.
2. Summary of the data sources used to measure the Rule's impact on Small Businesses
Section 227.114, Wis. Stats., defines a “small business" as “a business entity, including its affiliates, which is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field, and which employs 25 or fewer full-time employees or which has gross annual sales of less than $5,000,000." OCI reviewed premium revenue for domestic life insurers and fraternals. Based on either too much revenue or the ownership structure, it appears that none of Wisconsin's insurers qualify as small businesses.
3. Did the agency consider the following methods to reduce the impact of the Rule on Small Businesses?
Less Stringent Compliance or Reporting Requirements
Less Stringent Schedules or Deadlines for Compliance or Reporting
Consolidation or Simplification of Reporting Requirements
Establishment of performance standards in lieu of Design or Operational Standards
Exemption of Small Businesses from some or all requirements
Other, describe:
N/A. Any effect of the proposed rule on small businesses will be minimal. The proposed rule nominally increases the risk based capital requirement and should not change any charging structures.
4. Describe the methods incorporated into the Rule that will reduce its impact on Small Businesses
N/A. Any effect of the proposed rule on small businesses will be minimal.
5. Describe the Rule's Enforcement Provisions
The proposed rule nominally increases the risk based capital requirement for domestic life and health insurers who complete a life statement and domestic fraternal insurers. Failure to comply with the risk based capital requirement may be enforced by the Commissioner pursuant to ss. 601.41(4) and 601.64, Wis. Stats.
6. Did the Agency prepare a Cost Benefit Analysis (if Yes, attach to form)
Yes X No
Notice of Hearing
Safety and Professional Services
Safety, Buildings, and Environment — Plumbing,
Chs. SPS 381-387
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Department of Safety and Professional Services in ss. 145.13 and 227.11 (2), Stats., and interpreting s. 145.02 (2), Stats., the Department of Safety and Professional Services will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to renumber and amend s. SPS 381.01 (141) as s. SPS 381.01 (141) (a) to (c); amend ss. SPS 381.20 Table 381.20-11 (partial) line 6., 384.20 (2) (b) (Note), 384.40 (4) (intro.), and 384.40 (8) (a) and (d); and create ss. SPS 381.01 (141) (c) (Note), 381.20 Table 381.20-11 (partial) line 7., relating to U.S. EPA lead reduction rule, Safe Drinking Water Act amendments of 2011.
Date:   August 28, 2013
Time:  
1:00 p.m.
Location:
  1400 East Washington Avenue*
  Room 121C
  Madison, Wisconsin
  *Enter at North Dickinson Street
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.