Under FIRREA, the Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council is required to monitor state appraiser certifying and licensing agencies for the purpose of determining whether a state agency's policies, practices, and procedures are consistent with the federal law. The Appraisal Subcommittee may not recognize appraiser certifications and licenses from states whose appraisal policies, practices, or procedures are found to be inconsistent with FIRREA. Before refusing to recognize a state's appraiser certifications or licenses, the Appraisal Subcommittee must provide that state's certifying and licensing agency with a written notice of its intentions not to recognize the state's certified or licensed appraisers and ample opportunity to provide rebuttal information or to correct the conditions causing the refusal. A decision of the Subcommittee to refuse to recognize a state's appraiser certifications or licenses is subject to judicial review. 12 U.S.C. 3331 et seq.

In 1997, the Appraisal Subcommittee adopted the Policy Statements Regarding State Certification and Licensing of Real Estate Appraisers, which all states comply with. [The Appraisal Subcommittee's Policy Statements are available at http://www.asc.gov.]

(2) Appraisal Qualifications:

Under FIRREA, the state criteria for the qualifications of certified real estate appraisers must meet the minimum qualifications criteria for certification established by the Appraiser Qualifications Board (AQB) of the Appraisal Foundation. The minimum qualifications criteria established by the AQB are set forth in the Real Property Appraiser Qualification Criteria and Interpretations of the Criteria (“Criteria"). The AQB Criteria includes the minimum experience, examination, qualifying education and continuing education requirements that must be satisfied by an individual in order to obtain and maintain a certified appraisal credential. [The AQB Criteria is available on the Internet at http://www.appraisalfoundation.org.]

Under FIRREA, the states may establish their own qualifications and requirements for licensed appraiser credentials. The states are not obligated to adopt the minimum experience, examination, education and continuing education requirements recommended by AQB for the licensure of real estate appraisers. However, the Appraisal Subcommittee recommends that all states adopt the AQB Criteria established for licensed appraisers. The Department of Regulation and Licensing has adopted substantially all of the requirements set forth in the AQB Criteria established for the licensure of real estate appraisers.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states:

Under FIRREA (Federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989), all states, including Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan and Minnesota, that certify real estate appraisers for purposes of conducting appraisals in federally related transactions must assure compliance with the AQB (Appraiser Qualifications Board) Criteria for the licensure of real estate appraisers.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:

No study resulting in the collection of factual data was used relating to this rule. The primary methodology for revising the rule is the department's analysis and determination that a rule change is necessary.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact report:

The proposed rule-making would change rules related to education and experience requirements for real estate appraisers. Included among these rules are the amount of time applicants will be allowed to complete all requirements for licensure, the types of experience the department will accept for granting appraiser credentials, and the types of continuing education the department will approve. There are 1940 licensed appraisers, 1454 certified residential appraisers, and 1375 certified general appraisers who are licensed in Wisconsin and would have to comply with the standards, in addition to applicants. Of the appraisers who are licensed in Wisconsin, a majority of them probably work in small businesses.

For applicants who do not complete their education before 2008 there will be an increase in education to be paid for. Licensed appraisers will be required to obtain 150 hours instead of the previous requirement of 90 hours of education. This is a 66% increase in appraisal education to be paid for.

Certified residential appraisers will be required to obtain 200 hours instead of the previous requirement of 120 hours of education. This is a 66% increase in appraisal education to be paid for. Also, there will be an additional requirement of an associate degree or 21 semester credit hours in specific content areas. It is not likely that those without the degree will obtain the degree merely for this credential, but it is possible.

Certified general appraisers will be required to obtain 300 hours instead of the previous requirement of 180 hours of education. This is a 66% increase in appraisal education to be paid for. Also, there will be an additional requirement of a bachelor's degree or 30 semester credit hours in specific content areas. It is not likely that those without the degree will obtain the degree merely for this credential, but it is possible.

There will be no additional reporting requirements or bookkeeping requirements. Starting January 1, 2008, new educational requirements will need to be satisfied as stated in the rules. This will be an additional compliance cost for applicants. The additional cost amount is difficult to determine, but should not result in a significant cost impact on small business.

Section 227.137, Stats., requires an “agency" to prepare an economic impact report before submitting the proposed rule-making order to the Wisconsin Legislative Council. The Department of Regulation and Licensing is not included as an “agency" in this section.

Anticipated costs incurred by private sector:

The department finds that this rule has no significant fiscal effect on the private sector.

The change in requirements will result in minimal costs to the department.

These proposed rules will have no significant economic impact on small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats. The Department's Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at larry.martin@drl.state.wi.us, or by calling (608) 266-8608.

Pamela Haack, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Office of Legal Counsel, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 152, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935. Telephone: (608) 266-0495. Email: pamela.haack@drl.state.wi.us.

Comments may be submitted to Pamela Haack, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Office of Legal Counsel, 1400 East Washington Avenue, Room 152, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935; email pamela.haack@drl.state.wi.us. Comments must be received on or before May 22, 2006 to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Sections 108.14 (2) and 227.11, Stats., the Department of Workforce Development proposes to hold a public hearing to consider the creation of rules relating to unemployment insurance and temporary help employers and affecting small businesses.

Monday, May 1, 2006 at 1:30 p.m.

GEF 1 Building, H306

201 E. Washington Avenue

Madison

Interested persons are invited to appear at the hearings and will be afforded the opportunity to make an oral presentation of their positions. Persons making oral presentations are requested to submit their facts, views, and suggested rewording in writing.

Visitors to the GEF 1 building are requested to enter through the left East Washington Avenue door and register with the customer service desk. The entrance is accessible via a ramp from the corner of Webster Street and East Washington Avenue. If you have special needs or circumstances regarding communication or accessibility at the hearing, please call (608) 267-9403 at least 10 days prior to the hearing date. Accommodations such as ASL interpreters, English translators, or materials in audiotape format will be made available on request to the fullest extent possible.

Statutory authority: This rule making amends ch. Trans 152, relating to Wisconsin Interstate Fuel Tax and International Registration Plan programs. The rule making clarifies Department policies regarding application requirements, business location, collections, and overdue billings. The rule making also reflects a statutory change in 1999 Wis. Act 145 that transfers appeals of certain determinations of the Department of Transportation from the Division of Hearings and Appeals to the Tax Appeals Commission..

Statutes interpreted: Sections 108.04 (7), 108.04 (8)

Related statutes: Sections 108.02 (24m) and 108.065, Stats.

Explanation of agency authority. Section 108.14 (2), Stats., provides that the Department may adopt and enforce all rules which it finds necessary or suitable to carry out Chapter 108, Stats., regarding unemployment insurance. Section 108.04 (7), Stats., provides that if an employee terminates work with an employing unit, the employee is ineligible for unemployment insurance except under certain conditions. Section 108.04 (8), Stats., provides that if an employee fails, without good cause, to accept suitable work when offered, the employee is ineligible for unemployment insurance except under certain conditions.

Summary of the proposed rule. For the purpose of unemployment insurance, an employment relationship normally ends when an employee is laid off without a definite return-to-work date, even if recall is anticipated. If a subsequent offer is refused, it is considered a refusal of new work under s. 108.04 (8), Stats. The employment relationship between a temporary help agency and its employees does not follow the patterns that apply to most other employment relationships. In the temporary help industry, it is common for employees to be assigned to a series of assignments at different locations with different duties, wages, and other conditions. It is also common for these assignments to end with little or no notice to either the employee or the employer. While the parties may fully intend to continue the relationship, the short notice that an assignment has ended may require that a short period of time pass before the employer is able to send the employee to the next assignment. This proposed rule establishes standards for determining whether the employment relationship continues or is terminated for the purpose of unemployment insurance benefit eligibility.

When an assignment from a temporary help employer ends, an employee is eligible for unemployment insurance benefits while the employment relationship continues between assignments, if he or she is otherwise qualified. Under the proposed rule, the employment relationship between a temporary help employer and the employee is considered to be a continuing relationship if all of the following conditions are met:

On or before the end of the first full business day after the end of an assignment, the employee contacts the employer, or the employer contacts the employee, and informs the other that the assignment has ended. The department may waive this deadline if it determines that the employer or employee's failure to communicate was for good cause and the employer and employee have otherwise acted in a manner consistent with the continuation of the employment relationship.

On or before the end of the first full business day after the end of an assignment, the employer informs the employee that the employer will provide a new assignment that will begin within 7 days and either the employer provides a new assignment that does begin within 7 days or, within that same 7-day period, the employer notifies the employee of a delay in the start of the new assignment or notifies the employee of another assignment that will begin within 7 days of the new notice and the delayed or other assignment does begin within those 7 days.

The assignment offered by the employer meets the conditions under which the individual offered to work, including the type of work, rate of pay, days and hours of availability, distance willing to travel to work, and available modes of transportation, as set forth in the individual's written application for employment with the employer submitted prior to the first assignment, or as subsequently amended by mutual agreement. The employer has the burden of proof to show that the assignment meets these requirements.

Chapter 108, Stats., provides that an employee is ineligible for unemployment insurance if the employee voluntarily separated from the employment, unless certain exceptions apply. Under the proposed rule, the employment relationship between a temporary help employer and the employee is considered to be voluntarily separated by the employee when any of the following occur:

The employee fails to notify the employer that an assignment has ended if the employer's policy requires such notification and the employee had notice of this policy prior to the end of the assignment, provided that the employer is not aware that the assignment has ended.

The employee refuses an assignment while the employment relationship continues.

The employee fails to respond to an offer of work by the employer while the employment relationship continues.

The employer is unable to communicate an offer of work to the employee because of the employee's failure to provide the employer with a correct address, telephone number, or other contact information while the employment relationship continues.

Any other circumstances that would be considered separation by the employee under Chapter 108, Stats.

If an employment relationship does not continue under the terms of the proposed rule, the employment shall be considered separated by the employer unless the employee has voluntarily separated from the employment as provided in the list above or any other provision of Chapter 108, Stats.

When the employment relationship terminates, the employee's application for employment shall expire. If the employee returns to work for the employer, a new application for employment will be required for this chapter to be applicable. If the employee agrees in writing, the original application may be treated as a new application for employment.

Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies. In 1994 the Department responded to concerns expressed by temporary help employers and adopted a policy that considers the employment relationship between a temporary help employer and its employee to continue for a maximum of 14 days after the last day of work while the employer looks for another assignment for the employee, provided the employer guaranteed the employee an assignment to begin within that time period. Refused assignments during that 14-day extension period are considered separations by the employee.

The proposed Chapter DWD 133 codifies the informal policy that is currently in place, with minor adjustments. The proposed rule provides for an extension of the employment relationship while the employer finds a new assignment for the employee, provided that future offers of work are within the confines of the application for employment. The application for employment will be treated as a quasi-employment contract. This provides protection for the employer and the employee as both parties are put on notice as to what type of work will continue the employment relationship. If a subsequent assignment made within the confines of the application for employment is refused during the extension period, the employee is considered to have separated because the employment relationship is considered to still exist.

Comparison with federal law. There is no federal unemployment insurance law that specifically covers treatment of employees of temporary help companies.

Comparison with rules in adjacent states. Minnesota. An individual who within 5 calendar days after completion of a suitable temporary job assignment fails without good cause to affirmatively request an additional job assignment or refuses without good cause an additional suitable job assignment offered shall be considered to have quit employment. This provision applies only if at the beginning of employment with the temporary help company, the applicant signed and was provided a copy of a separate document that informed the applicant of this paragraph and that unemployment benefits may be affected.

Iowa:

An individual who fails without good cause to notify the temporary help company of the completion of an assignment and seek reassignment within 3 working days shall be considered to have voluntary quit employment, unless the individual was not advised in writing of the duty to notify the temporary help company of the completion of an assignment.

Michigan:

An individual is disqualified from receiving benefits if the temporary help company provided the employee with written notice before the employee began performing services stating that within 7 days after completion of an assignment the employee must notify the temporary help company and failure to provide notice of completion of an assignment constitutes a voluntary quit that will affect the employee's eligibility for unemployment insurance and the employee did in fact not notify the temporary help company of completion of the assignment within 7 days.

Illinois:

There is a rebuttable presumption that an individual is not actively seeking work if the individual was last employed by a temporary help company and the temporary help company alleges that during the week for which the individual claimed benefits, he or she did not contact the temporary help company for an assignment. The presumption is rebutted if the individual shows that he or she did contact the temporary help company or that he or she had good cause for failure to contact the temporary help company for an assignment.

Effect on small business. The proposed rule will affect temporary help employers, some of which are small businesses. Using the best data available, the Department estimates that the number of temporary help employers in 2004 was 721. Of these, 203 had a monthly average of 1-25 employees but may involve a larger number of individuals given the temporary nature of employment provided.

There are no reporting, bookkeeping, or other procedures required for compliance with the proposed rule and no professional skills are required. The proposed rule was developed in consultation with the temporary help industry and reflects current best practices in the industry.

The Department's Small Business Regulatory Coordinator:

Jennifer Jirschele

(608) 266-1023

jennifer.jirschele@dwd.state.wi.us.

Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business. There is no data available that allows the Department to accurately determine the number of temporary help employers that meet the definition of small business in s. 227.114 (1), Stats. The data that is available on a business entity's number of employees is from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, which is based on UI reports and Multiple Worksite Reports (MWR). When available, MWRs provide a disaggregation of data. The data does not identify if a business is independently owned and operated, if employees are full-time or part-time, or if a business is dominant in its field.

The Department requested information on the number of temporary help employers that have gross annual sales of less than $5 million from the Department of Revenue, but they were unable to provide it.

The rule reflects current best practices in the temporary help industry and is not expected to qualify or disqualify more claimants of employers following these practices.

The proposed rules are available at the web site http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov by typing “unemployment insurance and temporary help employers" in the search engine. This site allows you to view documents associated with this rule's promulgation, register to receive email notification whenever the Department posts new information about this rulemaking order, and submit comments and view comments by others during the public comment period. You may receive a paper copy of the rule by contacting:

Elaine Pridgen

Office of Legal Counsel

Dept. of Workforce Development

P.O. Box 7946

Madison, WI 53707-7946

(608) 267-9403

Written comments. Written comments on the proposed rules received at the above address, email, or through the http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov web site no later than May 3, 2006, will be given the same consideration as testimony presented at the hearing.