Rules of procedure of the Labor and Industry Review Commission. Administrative Code Reference: ch. LIRC 1-4.
Objective of the rule. The commission proposes to update and reorganize ch. LIRC 1-4 to clarify provisions relating to when, where and how petitions for commission review may be filed, to create a provision allowing petitions for review to be filed electronically through the commission's website in Unemployment Insurance and Workers Compensation cases, and to clarify provisions relating to use of hearing transcripts, synopses and summaries of evidence, and audio recordings of hearing by the commission in conducting its review.
Policy analysis
The commission reviews and decides appeals of decisions of administrative law judges of the Department of Workforce Development in cases arising under Wisconsin's unemployment insurance, workers compensation, employment discrimination and public accommodations discrimination laws. The commission's rules govern practice and procedure in such appeals.
Cases are appealed to the commission by filing a petition for review. Changes in available technologies, and in practice in the DWD divisions with respect to receipt and processing of petitions, have led the commission to conclude that it would be beneficial to update and clarify the provisions of its rules of practice governing when, where and how petitions for commission review may be filed. This will include adding a provision allowing petitions to be filed electronically in certain cases. The intended purpose of these changes is to make those provisions easier to understand, to make it easier to file petitions, and to reduce the occurrence of disputes about whether a petition has been properly filed.
The commission reviews cases based on the record made in the administrative proceedings below. The record may be in one or more of several forms (tape audio recording, digital audio recording, court reporter's notes, summary or synopsis of testimony, verbatim transcript). Changes in technologies used to preserve the record, and changes in practice in the DWD divisions with respect to record, have led the commission to conclude that it would be beneficial to update and clarify the provisions of its rules of practice governing how the record may be submitted for the commission's use in its review, what form of record the commission will use in particular cases, and how and on what terms copies of the record will be made available to the parties and others. The intended purpose of these changes is to make those provisions easier to understand, to ensure that the best record is used by the commission in its review, and to ensure that all parties have fair and equal access to copies of the record used by the commission in reviewing their cases.
Statutory authority
Section 103.04 (2).
Staff time required
The commission estimates that it will take 40 hours of staff time to promulgate the proposed changes to ch. LIRC 1-4.
Entities affected by the rule
The entities affected by the proposed rules are parties to contested cases which are appealed to the commission.
Comparison with federal requirements
There are no federal regulations governing procedure before the commission.
Natural Resources
Subject
Objective of the rule. The objective of the proposed rules is to close commercial clamming on the Mississippi River.
Policy analysis
The Department is beginning the administrative process to close commercial clamming on the Mississippi River.
Wisconsin's Commercially harvestable native freshwater mussel stocks are in significant decline, especially in zebra mussel-infested waterbodies. Although commercial demand has weakened since 1997, reinstatement of commercial harvest will accelerate ongoing declines in stocks.
Surveys done since 1998 in historically harvested river reaches have demonstrated extreme reductions in population densities and the near absence of recruitment. These losses have primarily been attributed to the negative effects of colonization by the non-indigenous zebra mussel, which first appeared in Wisconsin in 1990. These recent stock reductions are in addition to documented reductions since 1980 from commercial over-harvest and various die-off events.
Management objectives for commercial mussel stocks in the Mississippi River are to return population densities and recruitment to 1980 levels. These levels are documented in WDNR surveys done from 1976 – 1980. Population declines are based on WDNR, U. S. Fish and Wildlife and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers surveys done virtually every year since 1976.
Statutory authority
Sections 29.537 (8) (a), and 227.11, Stats.
Staff time required
Approximately 150 hours will be needed by the Department to develop these rules.
Entities affected by the rule
These proposed regulation changes would affect and are of interest to potential commercial clammers.
Comparison with federal requirements
There are no federal regulations regarding commercial clamming regulations. That authority is given to the State.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.