Under this proposal, the department could select either to issue free tags or to hold an October four day firearm season, but is not required to select both.

In the CWD management zone, whenever a management unit's deer population is over its established goal, the department may require that a hunter first harvest an antlerless deer before harvesting a buck. This proposal exempts a hunter from earn-a-buck requirements in filling their archery or gun buck deer carcass tag. This proposal preserves the earn-a-buck regulation as it applies to special, free permits issued in the CWD management zone.

These rules are applicable to individual sportspersons and impose no compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses, and no design or operational standards are contained in the rule.

Pursuant to s. 227.114, Stats., it is not anticipated that the proposed rules will have a significant economic impact on small businesses.

The Department's Small Business Regulatory Coordinator may be contacted at SmallBusiness@dnr.state.wi.us or by calling (608) 266-1959.

The Department has made a preliminary determination that this action does not involve significant adverse environmental effects and does not need an environmental analysis under ch. NR 150, Wis. Adm. Code. However, based on the comments received, the Department may prepare an environmental analysis before proceeding with the proposal. This environmental review document would summarize the Department's consideration of the impacts of the proposal and reasonable alternatives.

None.

None.

These rules, and the legislation which grants the department rule making authority, do not have a significant fiscal effect on the private sector. Additionally, no significant costs are associated with compliance to these rules.

The department recommends promulgating administrative rules that modify ch. NR 10 related to deer hunting seasons and the use and issuance of deer tags.

This proposal will, upon an order of the secretary, allow the department to distribute antlerless deer permits for the cost of issuance in designated herd control units without holding a four-day, October antlerless firearm hunt in the same units. Under current rules, if the department issues antlerless permits for only cost of issuance, it must also hold the four day season.

Additionally, the rule establishes that the department may not require that a hunter harvest an antlerless deer before harvesting a buck when using their archery or gun buck deer carcass tag in a CWD management zone. The harvest of additional bucks will continue to first require the harvest of an antlerless deer.

The department already administers the creation and distribution of carcass tags for deer hunting and establishes and publishes hunting season information. No new processes, record keeping, or printing requirements are created as a result of this proposal. Additionally, there are no new requirements of law enforcement as a result of this proposal. The department does not anticipate any fiscal effect from the provisions of this proposal.

No long range fiscal implications are anticipated.

The emergency rule procedure, pursuant to s. 227.24, Stats., is necessary and justified in establishing rules to protect the public welfare. The rule is necessary in order to foster participation by hunters and landowners so they will continue to hunt and cooperate in CWD control and deer herd management. This rule proposal balances pressing social concerns about the quality of the deer hunt with the need for effective herd control measures such as additional antlerless deer harvest in management units that are more than 20% over population goals or simply over population goals in units that are part of the CWD Management Zone. This rule will increase harvest of bucks in the CWD zone which have a higher prevalence of CWD and, because of their greater dispersal distances, have a higher likelihood of spreading CWD. However, the rule retains a herd control tool which requires that antlerless deer be harvested before additional bucks (beyond the initial one) may be taken. The federal government and state legislature have delegated to the appropriate agencies rule-making authority to control and regulate hunting of wild animals. The State of Wisconsin must provide publications describing the regulations for deer hunting to more than 630,000 deer hunters prior to the start of the season. These regulations must be approved prior to printing nearly 1 million copies of the regulations publication.

Scott Loomans, 101 South Webster St., PO BOX 7921, Madison, WI 53707-7921. (608) 267-2452, scott.loomans@wisconsin.gov.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to authority vested in the Department of Regulation and Licensing in sections 15.08 (5) (b), 227.11 (2) (a), 440.03 (1), 448.40 (1) Stats., the Department of Regulation and Licensing will hold a public hearing at the time and place indicated below to consider an order to renumber and amend section RL 4.08 (intro), and to create section RL 4.08 (2), relating to background checks and fingerprinting.

Interested persons are invited to present information at the hearing. Persons appearing may make an oral presentation but are urged to submit facts, opinions and argument in writing as well. Facts, opinions and argument may also be submitted in writing without a personal appearance by mail addressed to the Department of Regulation and Licensing, Division of Board Services, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708. Written comments must be received at or before the public hearing to be held on July 20, 2011, to be included in the record of rule-making proceedings. Comments may be submitted to Shawn Leatherwood, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708-8935, or by email to Shancethea.Leatherwood@wisconsin.gov.

Copies of this proposed rule are available upon request Shawn Leatherwood, Paralegal, Department of Regulation and Licensing, Division of Board Services, 1400 East Washington Avenue, P.O. Box 8935, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, or by email at Shancethea.Leatherwood@wisconsin
.gov.

Sections 440.03 (13) (a), (b) and (c), and 448.05 (1) (a), Stats.

Sections 15.08 (5) (b), 227.11 (2) (a), 440.03 (1), 448.40 (1), Stats.

Section 448.05, Stats., is enforced and administered by the Department of Regulation and Licensing (“DRL") and the Medical Examining Board. Specifically, s. 448.40 (1), Stats., authorizes the Medical Examining Board to promulgate rules to carry out the purposes of the Medical Examining Board subchapter. Section 448.05 (1), Stats., is in the Medical Examining Board subchapter.

Further, the Medical Examining Board is obligated under s. 15.08 (5) (b), Stats., to promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.

DRL is a department in the state government, and is therefore an “agency" under s. 227.01 (1), Stats. Under s. 227.11(2) (a), Stats., it may promulgate rules interpreting the provisions of any statute enforced or administered by it, if the agency considers it necessary to effectuate the purpose of the statute. Both ss. 440.03 (13) and 448.05 (1), Stats., are enforced and administered by DRL.

Last, DRL is authorized under s. 440.03 (1), Stats., to promulgate rules defining uniform procedures to be used by the department, the attached boards, the examining boards, and the affiliated credentialing boards.

Section 440.03 (7) Stats., and Wis. Admin. Code § RL 4.07 (52).

Subject to ss. 111.321, 111.322 and 111.355, Stats., s. 448.05 (1) (a), Stats., requires that an applicant must not have an arrest or conviction record to be qualified for the grant of any license by the Medical Examining Board. Section 448.03 (13) (a), Stats., authorizes DRL to conduct investigations to determine whether applicants have arrest or conviction records and require applicants to provide any information that is necessary for the investigation. Under s. 448.03 (13) (b), Stats., DRL may investigate whether applicants to practice medicine and surgery have arrest or conviction records pursuant to rules it promulgates.

DRL promulgated Wis. Admin. Code chs. RL 4.07 and RL 4.08 to interpret s. 448.03 (13), Stats. Under chs. RL 4.07 and RL 4.08, DRL may require an applicant for ph ysician licensure to submit fingerprints and undergo a criminal background check if “there exists reason to believe that the applicant has failed to accurately describe his or her conviction record."

The addition to Section 1 creates a class of licensed credentials the applicants for which may be required to be photographed, submit fingerprints, and undergo criminal background checks in situations when there is not a reason to believe that an applicant has failed to accurately describe his or her conviction record.

Section 2 defines the class of licensed credentials created by the changes to Section 1. Section 2 requires applicants for a physician license to practice medicine and surgery to submit a full set of fingerprints along with their application for licensure. The fingerprints will be used to verify the applicant's identity and conduct searches for criminal arrests and convictions in accordance with s. 440.03 (13), Stats.

The FBI will conduct background checks pursuant to federal law or a state law approved by the U.S. Attorney General under Public Law 92-544 (1972). DRL contacted the Crime Information Bureau of the Wisconsin Department of Justice to determine whether s. 440.03 (13), Stats., is an approved statute to authorize DRL to require background checks of applicants to practice medicine and surgery. On January 7, 2011, Phillip Collins, Deputy Director of the Crime Information Bureau confirmed that that the FBI approves s. 440.03 (13), Stats., as a statute authorizing DRL to require background checks of applicants to practice medicine and surgery.

Illinois statute requires applicants for medical licensure to provide fingerprints for a criminal background check. 225 ILCS 60/9.7. The statute further requires the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation to promulgate rules to implement the requirement. Id. However, a review of Illinois' application and online instructions indicates that Illinois currently does not require applicants to submit fingerprints or undergo background checks.
See http://www.idfpr.com/dpr/WHO/med.asp, accessed on Jan. 3, 2011.

Iowa administrative rules require applicants for medical licensure to pay for and provide a full set of fingerprints for state and federal criminal background checks. IAC 653-9.4 (2) p., 9.5 (3) p., 9.6 (2) j. and 8.4 (7). Iowa promulgated the administrative rules based on the federal Volunteers for Children Act, Public Law 105-251 (1998). The U.S. Attorney General already approved the Volunteers for Children Act as a basis to enable “qualified entities" to require employees and volunteers to submit fingerprints for non- law enforcement criminal background checks.

Michigan statute requires applicants for medical licensure to provide fingerprints for state and federal criminal background checks. MCL 333.16174 (3).

Minnesota currently does not require applicants for medical licensure to undergo criminal background checks.

In February 2010, DRL was awarded an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant to lead a group of nine states to reduce barriers to the portability of physician licenses. Since the award, Wisconsin has worked with Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri and South Dakota to develop best practices to improve the licensing process of physicians. In November, the states identified requiring applicants to submit fingerprints and undergo criminal background as a best practice. The requirement conforms to longstanding recommendations by the Federation of State Medical Boards (“FSMB").

Since April 2001, FSMB has affirmed its position that it is a best practice for state medical boards to “conduct criminal background checks as part of the licensure application process. See Federation of State Medical Boards, Public Policy Compendium, April 2010. The FSMB reaffirmed its position in April 2010. Id.

Further, as of September 2010, 35 out of 68 U.S. medical and osteopathic boards require applicants to submit fingerprints and undergo criminal background checks as part of the application process. FSMB, Criminal Background Checks Overview by State, Last Updated September 6, 2010, at http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/GRPOL_Criminal_Background_Checks.pdf.

Section 227.137, Stats., requires an “agency" to prepare an economic impact report before submitting the proposed rule-making order to the Wisconsin Legislative Council. The Department of Regulation and Licensing is not included as an “agency" in this section.

These proposed rules will be reviewed by the department's Small Business Review Advisory Committee to determine whether the rules will have any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses, as defined in s. 227.114 (1), Stats.

The Department's Regulatory Review Coordinator may be contacted by email at john.murra y@wisconsin.gov, or by calling (608) 266-8608.

The department estimates that the proposed rule will have no significant fiscal impact.

Every person seeking initial licensure to practice medicine and surgery in Wisconsin will incur the cost of conducting the criminal background check. The cost to the applicant of conducting a criminal background check is approximately $56.25. The cost is the price the department charges applicants for the professions that it currently requires undergoing the same criminal background check process.