Funding – Kathy Cushman, Citations and Withdrawals Section, DOT Division of Motor Vehicles.
  Milwaukee Police Department Traffic Enforcement Policy and Data Analysis — Milwaukee Chief of Police Ed. Flynn.
  Fundamental Questions and Benchmarks and a Draft Data Analysis Report Outline — Kristi Waits, Program Director, OJA Strategic Analysis Center.
  Monitoring Stops for Biased Policing in Washington State — John R. Batiste, Chief of the Washington State Patrol.
  Data Collection and Community Partnerships — Noble Wray, Chief of Police, Madison Police Department.
  Local Law Enforcement Data Assessment (LLEDA), UW Report to BOTS — Joni Graves, Program Director, UW-Madison Transportation Information Center.
  Analysis Software for Local Analysis — Greg Ridgeway, Ph.D. Director, RAND Corporation.
  Benchmarks — Lorie Fridell, Ph.D., University of South Florida, Department of Criminology.
Listening Sessions were held by the Advisory Committee and OJA from 4 and 7 PM on November 11, 2009 (La Crosse), November 12, 2009 (Green Bay), November 18 (Milwaukee), December 1, 2009 (Rice Lake, Superior, Crandon and Keshena), and December 12, 2009 (Kenosha/Racine). At the sessions the committee and OJA heard from citizens who commented about the issue of racial profiling and traffic stops and about the traffic stop data collection project mandated by 2009 Wisconsin Act 28.
Small Business Impact
This rule does not have a significant effect on small business.
Fiscal Estimate
State fiscal effect
Increase costs, program revenue.
Local government fiscal effect
No fiscal effect.
Private sector fiscal effect
No fiscal effect.
A copy of the full fiscal estimate may be obtained from the agency contact person listed below, upon request.
Agency Contact Person
Dennis Schuh, Program Director
Office of Justice Assistance
1 S. Pinckney Street, Suite 615
Madison, WI 53703
Phone: (608) 266-7682
Notice of Hearing
Natural Resources
Fish, Game, etc., Chs. NR 1
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to ss. 77.06 (2), 77.82 (2m) and (4), 77.88 (2) (d) 2., 77.91 (1) and 227.11 (2) (a), Stats., the Department of Natural Resources will hold a public hearing on revisions to Chapter NR 46, Wis. Adm. Code, relating to the administration of the Forest Crop Law and the Managed Forest Law.
Hearing Information
The hearing will be held on:
Video conference participation will be available at:
April 14, 2010   The Pyle Center
Wednesday   702 Langdon St.
at 10:00 a.m.   Madison
  Room 211
  Communication Art Center (CAC)
  UW-Stevens Point, 1101 Reserve St.
  Stevens Point
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, reasonable accommodations, including the provision of information material in an alternative format, will be provided for qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. Please call Kathy Nelson (608) 266-3545 with specific information on your request at least 10 days before the date of the scheduled hearing.
Copies of Proposed Rule and Submission of Written Comments
The proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be reviewed and comments electronically submitted at the following Internet site: http://adminrules.wisconsin.gov. A personal copy of the proposed rule and fiscal estimate may be obtained from Ms. Nelson.
Written comments on the proposed rule may be submitted via U.S. mail to Ms. Kathy Nelson FR/4 Bureau of Forest Management, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Comments may be submitted until April 30, 2010.
Written comments whether submitted electronically or by U.S. mail will have the same weight and effect as oral statements presented at the public hearings.
Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources
Statutes interpreted
Section 77.06 (2) and subch. VI Ch. 77, Stats.
Statutory authority
Sections 77.06 (2), 77.82 (3) (c), 77.91 (1), Wis. Stats., and 227.11 (2) (a), Wis. Stats.
Sections 77.06 (2) and 77.91 (1), Wis. Stats. directs the department to establish stumpage rates on an annual basis for use in determining the severance and yield taxes assessed when timber is harvested from lands designated as forest crop land and managed forest land. New rates shall take effect on November 1 each year. Section 77.82 gives implicit authority to the department to create rules for processing petitions.
Summary of proposed rule
The proposed rule:
1.   Revises the annual stumpage rates for the period between November 1, 2010 and October 31, 2011 as required in ss. 77.06(2) and 77.91(1), Stats. The average change from the current rate is a 3% decrease in sawtimber, a 4% decrease for pulpwood, a 3% decrease for mixed products, and a 1% increase in piece products.
2.   Creates an exemption for payment to f forest crop law termination taxes if land ownership changes have occurred after the original landowner received notification of forest crop law expiration and new landowner certifies intent to enter into the managed forest law program.
3.   Clarifies the requirements for additions to existing managed forest law lands.
4.   Amends the certified plan writer reporting requirements for plan preparation costs and requirements for making an offer to landowners for management plan writing services. Amend the department billing requirements when invoicing landowner for plan preparation fees.
5.   Amends the stocking requirements for management of plantations.
Annual Stumpage Rate Adjustment:
For purposes of the Forest Crop Law (FCL) and the Managed Forest Law (MFL), this rule repeals NR 46.30(2)(a) to (g) and recreates NR 46.30(2)(a) to (h) to revise annual stumpage values used to calculate severance and yield taxes due on timber cut during the period from November 1, 2010 through October 31, 2011. One new stumpage table is created to represent stumpage values used to calculate severance and yield taxes on timber if the timber sold by weight (tons) includes both pulpwood and fine woody material. Thirteen separate zones reflect varying stumpage values for different species and products across the state.
Timber prices have steadily fallen throughout the past year, although overall prices did not fall as significantly as what was observed one year earlier. The average statewide prices for sawlogs decreased 3%, with a range of a 13% increase to a 34% decrease. The average statewide prices for pulpwood decreased 4%, with a range of a 16% increase to a 20% decrease. Prices for mixed products (mixture of sawlogs and pulpwood for red pine, white pine and spruce) have dropped 3%, with a range of a 32% increase and a 21% decrease. Piece products (posts, poles and Christmas trees) had a 1% increase in prices, with some market zones having an increase in prices of 4% to a 1% decrease.
While the statewide stumpage rates largely decreased, there are fluctuations between market zones and individual prices. Of all total 630 prices calculated, 149 (24%) increased, 198 (31%) decreased and 283 (45%) stayed the same.
The severance and yield tax collected in CY 2009 was $1,284,934. This value is 26% lower than it was in CY 2008. Timber harvest volumes are down since CY 2008 by the following amounts:
Timber Product
% Change
Cordwood
Down 17%
Fuelwood
Up 97%
Sawlogs
Down 20%
Mixed Product
Up 106%
Piece Products
Down 2%
If the same amount of timber is harvested in 2011 as was harvested in 2009, local municipalities will receive a decrease in the yield and severance tax payments by an estimated $1,500. Estimates are based on the average change in rates for private land timber sales across species and zone for each product type (cordwood, sawtimber and mixed), the volumes reported and paid for in CY 2009, and the assumption that the volume and the ratio of the cordwood and sawtimber will remain the same. Actual impact for a county and municipality will vary by the number of harvests completed and the actual species and products cut.
Amendments to minimum medium density of plantations in NR 46.02(24m) and NR 46.18(2)(d):
Stocking requirements are established to determine when lands are adequately stocked and capable of fully utilizing the site to grow forest products in a reasonable time frame. Fully stocked stands can be thinned or harvested at regular intervals, providing Wisconsin's forest products industry with valuable raw material and local municipalities with a periodic income through payment of severance and yield taxes.
The minimum medium density for plantations has been established at 600 trees per acre. Current research has shown that plantations have the ability to fully utilize the size at lower densities than was previously determined, as long as the trees are evenly distributed throughout an area. NR 46.02(24m) and NR 46.18(2) will be amended to establish the minimum medium density for a plantation at 400 trees per acre to reflect this new information.
Amendments to the managed forest law petition deadlines and management plans if petitions from owners of land entered as forest crop land are subject to an ownership change within 18 months prior to the end of the forest crop law contract period in NR 46.16(1)(cm) and NR 46.18(5)(c).
Landowners who purchase expiring forest crop law lands within 18 months prior to the expiration of forest crop law contract may be interested in enrolling in the managed forest law program. New landowners, depending upon the date of purchase, may find it difficult to meet the petition deadlines established by statute and administrative code. Forest crop law lands that are not immediately enrolled in the managed forest law are placed on the regular property tax rolls and landowners are assessed a termination tax.
NR 46.16 (1) (cm) is created to allow landowners who purchase expiring forest crop law lands within 18 months prior to the end of the forest crop law expiration the opportunity to apply for the July 1 petition deadline or later for good cause to be considered for designation effective the following January 1.
Management plans would need to be developed by certified plan writers; however management plans would not need to have been previously reviewed by the department by the deadline date of March 1. Department review of the managed forest law petition will be done according to the provisions of NR 46.18 (5).
Amendments to the requirements for additions to existing managed forest land in NR 46.16(7):
Recent changes to NR 46.16(5) required that landowners enroll lands by municipality except when lands on either side of the municipal line do not meet eligibility requirements. Changes to NR 46.16(7) will require that the same eligibility requirements apply to additions as well as new enrollments so that additions across municipal lines are done only in situations where lands cannot qualify for a new entry under NR 46.17 and s. 77.82 (1) (a), Stats.
Amendment to the format that Certified Plan Writers submit plan writing data to the department in NR 46.165(4)(f):
The method in which certified plan writers submit their plan preparation costs for work done in the previous 12 months is being amended to make it easier for certified plan writers to submit the data.
Currently, NR 46.165 (4) (f) requires that certified plan writers submit their plan preparation cost by base rate per plan plus the cost per acre. Many certified plan writers charge clients an hourly rate or a per acre rate. These certified plan writers are not able to easily determine their base rate and cost per acre.
The change to administrative code will eliminate the requirement to submit a base rate per plan.
The department collects this information in order to determine the average cost of plan writing services statewide. This average value is used to charge landowners for plan writing services on plans that the department writes.
Eliminate the requirement that offers for plan writing services must be in writing and guarantee that plans are submitted for the following July 1 deadline in NR 46.18(7)(c):
Management plans that are submitted for the July 1 petition deadline without a management plan or indicating a certified plan writer are placed on a management plan referral list. Certified plan writers are given the opportunity to offer plan writing services to landowners.
NR 46.18 (7) (c) provided that certified plan writers must submit their offers in writing and include the cost for the management plan preparation service and guarantee that an approvable plan will be completed by the following July 1. The department does not require that it receive a copy of the offer, only that a certified plan writer report that an offer has been made within 5 days of the offer under NR 46.18(7)(d).
The managed forest law statutes and administrative codes establish the eligibility and management provisions of the program, but do not establish the business practices of certified plan writers in working with private landowners. Additionally, the cooperating forester agreement (note: certified plan writers must also be a cooperating forester) states that cooperating foresters have sole control over the methods, hours worked, and time and manner of any performance under the agreement other than as expressly required by the Cooperative Agreement.
Because the department has no mechanism to insure that written offers are provided to landowners, and because the department does not direct the business practices of certified plan writers, NR 46.18(7)(c) this provision will be removed from administrative code.
Amendment of the format in which the department charges landowners for plan writing services in NR 46.18(8)(b).
The department must charge landowners a plan preparation fee that includes a base rate and a rate per acre. Changes to NR 46.165 (4) (f) to eliminate the requirement to submit a base rate per plan will require the department's billing procedure to also change. Changes to NR 46.18 (8) (b) will eliminate the base rate per plan.
Comparison of federal regulations
There are no known federal rules which apply to stumpage rates or Managed Forest Law petitions.
Comparison of rules in adjacent states
Checks with the surrounding states of Minnesota, Michigan, Iowa and Illinois indicate that while they offer some type of incentive program to forest landowners, none of the states have similar forestry practice requirements nor do they calculate annual stumpage rates for severance and yield taxes in conjunction with their programs.
Anticipated cost by private sector
For owners of land designated as managed forest law or forest crop law, there is an anticipated decrease in cost associated with the decrease in yield tax on managed forest law lands and severance tax on forest crop law lands based on the average decrease in stumpage rates proposed for both pulpwood (4% decrease) and sawlogs (3% decrease). Actual cost could be an increase or decrease depending on the specific species, product and zone.
For owners who qualify for the exemption of payment of the forest crop law termination tax, an estimated $3,000 will be saved by the owner. The estimated savings of $3,000 is based upon an average termination tax paid by owners in FY 2009. There will likely be one landowner per year who will qualify for this exemption.
Changes associated with submitting and approving management plans prepared by certified plan writers and DNR foresters will have no fiscal effect and allow additional time for plans to be written and approved.
Loading...
Loading...
Links to Admin. Code and Statutes in this Register are to current versions, which may not be the version that was referred to in the original published document.