LRB-1915/1
CMH:wlj:rs
2007 - 2008 LEGISLATURE
March 19, 2007 - Introduced by Joint Legislative Council. Referred to
Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.
AB197,1,3 1An Act to amend 165.92 (3) (a) and 165.92 (3) (b) 1.; and to create 165.92 (3)
2(c) of the statutes; relating to: liability for the actions of tribal law enforcement
3officers when enforcing state law.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill is explained in the Notes provided by the Joint Legislative Council in
the bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
Joint Legislative Council prefatory note: This bill, developed by the Joint
Legislative Council's special committee on state-tribal relations, addresses liability for
the actions of a law enforcement officer employed by an American Indian tribe or band
in this state (a tribal law enforcement officer) when enforcing the laws of this state.
BACKGROUND
Tribal law enforcement officers do not have the inherent power to enforce state
laws but, in Wisconsin, may acquire this power in one of two ways. First, the state or a
subdivision of the state may grant this power on an individual basis. Most commonly, a
county sheriff will deputize qualified tribal law enforcement officers.
Second, state statutes may grant such power. The most notable example of this is
s. 165.92, stats., which authorizes a tribal law enforcement officer to enforce the laws of
this state with respect to any person within the boundaries of the tribe's reservation or
off-reservation trust lands, if the officer and the tribe meet several conditions. One

condition is that the tribe must adopt a resolution waiving the tribe's sovereign immunity
to the extent necessary to allow the enforcement of liability for its officers' actions in the
courts of this state, or adopt another resolution that the Department of Justice (DOJ)
determines has substantially the same result.
In addition, s. 175.40 (6) and (7), stats., gives the power to enforce state criminal
laws and the authority to aid and assist to peace officers outside their territorial
jurisdiction and to federal law enforcement officers anywhere in the state. The definition
of "peace officer" used in this statute includes tribal officers who are empowered to act
under s. 165.92.
The most recent example is s. 175.40 (6m), stats., created by 2005 Wisconsin Act
414
, which gives the power to enforce state criminal laws and the authority to aid and
assist to off-duty peace officers outside their territorial jurisdiction, under specified
circumstances. Again, "peace officer" includes tribal officers who are empowered to act
under s. 165.92. Unlike ss. 165.92 and 175.40 (6) and (7), the new statute addressing
off-duty officers states that, for purposes of civil and criminal liability (including legal
representation and payment of judgments) and worker's compensation, an off-duty
officer acting under that authority is considered to be acting in an official capacity as an
officer of the state, state employee, or agent of the state. Among other things, this means
that the state may be liable for the actions of an officer acting under s. 175.40 (6m).
THE BILL
Liability Under s. 165.92
The bill provides an alternative to the waiver of sovereign immunity by the tribe
that is currently required for a tribal law enforcement officer to exercise the powers
specified in s. 165.92. It allows the tribe to instead maintain liability insurance with a
limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence. It requires that the insurance policy provide
that the insurer may not raise the defense of tribal sovereign immunity in defending a
claim against the policy, up to the limits of the policy. This alternative applies only if the
tribe has provided evidence of the required insurance to DOJ.
The bill also makes a cross-reference change to clarify that a tribe's liability
includes liability for actions when transporting an arrested person and clarifies that the
tribe's liability is for the acts and omissions of its officers.
Liability Under s. 175.40 (6m)
As noted above, s. 175.40 (6m) specifies that an officer acting under its authority
is considered to be acting as an officer, agent, or employee of the state, meaning that the
state may be liable for the actions of a tribal officer empowered to act under s. 165.92,
among others, when acting under the authority of s. 175.40 (6m). At the same time, s.
165.92 (3) states that the employing tribe is liable for the actions of a tribal officer acting
under s. 165.92. To remove any ambiguity regarding which liability provision applies, the
bill clarifies that the liability provisions in s. 175.40 (6m) apply to a tribal officer acting
under the authority of that subsection.
AB197, s. 1 1Section 1. 165.92 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB197,3,22 165.92 (3) (a) Unless Except as provided in s. 175.40 (6m) (c) 1. and unless
3otherwise provided in a joint program plan under s. 165.90 (2) or an agreement
4between a political subdivision of this state and a tribe, the tribe that employs a tribal
5law enforcement officer is liable for all acts and omissions of the officer while acting
6within the scope of his or her employment and neither the state nor any political

1subdivision of the state may be held liable for any action of the officer taken under
2the authority of sub. (2) (a).
Note: Clarifies that the liability provisions of s. 175.40 (6m) apply to a tribal officer
acting under that subsection. This provision also clarifies that a tribe's liability is for the
acts and omissions of its officers and that it applies to the transportation of an arrested
person under s. 165.92 (2) (c), as well as actions empowered under s. 165.92 (2) (a).
AB197, s. 2 3Section 2. 165.92 (3) (b) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB197,3,104 165.92 (3) (b) 1. No Except as provided in par. (c), no tribal law enforcement
5officer may exercise or perform the powers or duties described under sub. (2) (a)
6unless the governing body of the tribe that employs the officer adopts and has in
7effect a resolution under this paragraph. Except as provided in subd. 2., a resolution
8under this paragraph shall include a statement that the tribe waives its sovereign
9immunity to the extent necessary to allow the enforcement in the courts of this state
10of its liability under par. (a).
AB197, s. 3 11Section 3. 165.92 (3) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
AB197,3,1312 165.92 (3) (c) 1. As an alternative to a resolution under par. (b), the tribe may
13maintain liability insurance that does all of the following:
AB197,3,1514 a. Covers the tribe and tribal law enforcement officers for acts and omissions
15under par. (a).
AB197,3,1616 b. Has a limit of coverage not less than $2,000,000 for any occurrence.
AB197,3,1817 c. Provides that the insurer, in defending a claim against the policy, may not
18raise the defense of sovereign immunity of the insured up to the limits of the policy.
AB197,4,219 2. This paragraph applies only if the tribe has presented evidence to the
20department of justice of the insurance under subd. 1. Upon receipt of evidence of the
21insurance under subd. 1., the department of justice shall notify the sheriff of each
22county and the chief of police of each municipality in which the tribe has a

1reservation or trust land that the tribe has met this criterion for performing the
2powers and duties described under sub. (2) (a).
AB197,4,33 (End)
Loading...
Loading...